Re: pg_checksums?
От | Paul Förster |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_checksums? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39A3E175-E161-4325-A4AE-41B088FFADF6@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_checksums? ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi Ron, > On Oct 29, 2023, at 16:38, Peter J. Holzer <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at> wrote: > And this is where it would break down. The modifications can't be > applied to the replica any more because the replica now contains > checksums and the modifications don't. In the best case the replica > would catch the discrepancy and refuse to apply the modifications which > would lead to the loss of these modifications. In the worst case it > would apply them anyway causing severe data corruption. ... > Not just the file headers. Every single data block. > > (Ok, it looks like the space for the checksum is reserved even if > checksums aren't enabled[1]. So at least pg_checksums doesn't have to > move data around to enable them. But overwriting a page with a checksum > with one without one would still be bad.) Those are the kind of answers and insights I was looking for. Thank you very much. Ok, I will do a reinit then. Cheers Paul
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: