Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL
От | Jeffrey A. Rhines |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39A2CF21.BA68B588@email.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL (Tressens Lionel <tressens@etud.insa-tlse.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I've wondered that myself, actually. What are the benefits and drawbacks to going with one over the other, besides the obvious 255-char field length limit for varchar? The reason to stay away from "memo" fields in other serious RDBMSs are typically more difficult maintenance, significantly lower performance, and requiring special function calls to get the data out. Do any of those apply to PG? Jeff Tom Lane wrote: > > Tressens Lionel <tressens@etud.insa-tlse.fr> writes: > > Le 22.08.00 a 09:37, "Roderick A. Anderson" m'ecrivait : > > )I was able to get the table format by using MS Access. Only question left > > )is what is the corresponding field type in PostgreSQL for a memo field in > > )SQL Server/Access (varchar(nnnn))? > > > 'text' type perhaps ? > > Uh ... what's wrong with varchar(n) ? > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: