Re: Search (select) options
От | Highway80 dude |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Search (select) options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 399A709C.4020307@highway80.net.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Search (select) options (Jeff Davis <jdavis@genesiswd.com>) |
Ответы |
Re[2]: Search (select) options // Max SQL length?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Perhaps you can use the UNION statement like so... SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE col1='x' UNION SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE col1='y' UNION SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE col1='z' Although, I have never tried stacking them before so I don't know if the above will work (with more than one UNION). Of course, this means there are 3 separate select statements instead of your 1 but perhaps it isn't as inefficient as it sounds since pg should process the whole transaction in the one commit. Jeff Davis wrote: > > I would like to be able to use searches that seem somewhat intelligent. > Can you 'ORDER BY' number of matching 'OR' clauses? For example, someone > searches for "x y z", so I would do "select * from mytable where col1 > like '%x%' or col1 like '%y%' or col1 like '%z%';", but I want it to > order by number of matches (so a match of y and z would turn up before a > match of just x). > > If anyone has suggestions, or can point me to some reading, I would > really appreciate it. The only thing I can think of is a complicated > application-side program. > > Thanks, > Jeff Davis > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: