Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3994.1238184078@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: > Dne 17.03.09 19:48, Chuck McDevitt napsal(a): >> Any obviously, we don't just use ours for platforms with no or broken getopt_long, >> since we are talking Solaris (which has a bug in getopt, but >> getopt_long works fine) > Just for clarification: > It is not bug in Solaris. Well, "bug" in the sense that it doesn't do what we want it to. After reviewing this thread and the one that led up to the 8.3 behavior, it seems clear that we failed to draw a distinction between getopt and getopt_long when we should have. We don't like Solaris' getopt but there seems no reason not to use Solaris' getopt_long. So Zdenek's suggestion to change configure seems the correct fix, and I've done that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: