Re: Replication options in Postgres
От | Chris Bitmead |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication options in Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 398625F7.C22A345C@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Replication options in Postgres (Erich <hh@cyberpass.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
I guess if you don't do deletes then something like selecting all the records with an oid greater than the last replication cycle would find the most recent additions. Erich wrote: > > I am setting up a system that processes transactions, and it needs to > be highly reliable. Once a transaction happens, it can never be > lost. This means that there needs to be real-time off-site > replication of data. I'm wondering what's the best way to do this. > > One thing that might simplify this system is that I _never_ use UPDATE > or DELETE. The only thing I ever do with the database is INSERT. So > this might make replication a little easier. > > I think I have a few possibilities: > > 1. In my PHP code, I have functions like > inserttransaction(values...). I could just modify inserttransaction() > so that it runs the same query (the INSERT) on two or more DB > servers. This would probably work ok. > > 2. I could write triggers for all my tables, so that when there is an > INSERT, the trigger does the same INSERT on the other server. Any > ideas for an efficient way to do this? > > 3. Any other tricks? > > I don't need mirroring. There will be one master and one or more > slaves, and the only thing the slaves will do is store backup data. > The most important thing is that I can't lose a single transaction. > > Thanks, > > e
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: