Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source
От | Chris Bitmead |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3984BDA3.8C06AEC6@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kaare Rasmussen wrote: > > > > The requirements seem to be pretty commonsense things... > > > If you use some source code from Inprise, you've got to > > > keep track of where the source came from, label it with > > > their license, list any modifications you've made, always > > > provide the source with any executables, etc. > > > > But the BSD license doesn't require source for distributed binaries. > > Sounds like a GPL-style restriction. > > What is more important to my mind is if the license permits a developer to look > at the code and get inspired, or if the developer's mind will be "tainted" just > by looking. > I hope someone can tell; I always wake up later with my head on the keyboard > when I try to read license stuff... I don't think the licence terms can have any effect on this. If you take an idea from one code base and apply it to another code-bases with a different licence, then the applicable law is going to be fair use. And licence terms cannot affect fair use one way or the other.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: