Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39709c58-34fc-942c-d0f9-aec54964a3d7@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/13/21 3:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2021-May-13, Stephen Frost wrote: > >> Or just accept that this is a bit hokey with the 'auto' approach. I get >> Bruce has concerns about it but I'm not convinced that it's actually all >> that bad to go with that. > Yeah, I think the alleged confusion there is overstated. > > I'm happy to act as committer for that if he wants to step away from it. > I'm already used to being lapidated at every corner anyway. > Many thanks Alvaro, among other things for teaching me a new word. cheers (delapidated) andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: