Re: performance question
От | ernie cline |
---|---|
Тема | Re: performance question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 396F1E66.9EA0C628@ipgdirect.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | performance question (ernie cline <ernie.cline@ipgdirect.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Arg! Thanks to everyone for their help. I followed a few suggestions I got from here, and installed Time::HiRes on my box (that part was my idea actually ;)), to monitor how long the query's take. I know all the stats show the MySQL is faster, but in my situation, postgres is really kicking ass. None of the query's took longer than .03 seconds ;). Then again, the database is small ... but anyway, in my script, we also call to an oracle Database. THAT is slow. Of the 2.6 seconds it takes to execute the script, 2.3 is that oracle call. Granted its a huge ~8 line query, but its still oracle's "fault". Thanks for all your help guys and gals! -ernie P.S. Anyone know of a script to convert oracle db to postgres? :) Or if I dump the oracle tables, will postgres be able to read them? Tom Lane wrote: > > ernie cline <ernie.cline@ipgdirect.com> writes: > >> Need more detail ... > > > What else do you need to know? > > What queries are you issuing, *exactly*? You might find it easiest > to restart the postmaster with -d2 and collect the queries in the > postmaster's log... > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: