Re: Alternative new libpq interface.
От | Chris Bitmead |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Alternative new libpq interface. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39644F37.EF8B8704@bitmead.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Alternative new libpq interface. (Chris Bitmead <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Alternative new libpq interface.
Re: Alternative new libpq interface. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-- > My gut feeling about this is that if a complete rewrite is being > considered, it ought to be done as a new interface library that's > independent of libpq. I was thinking more along the lines of massaging the current libpq to support the new interface/features rather than starting with a blank slate. As you say libpq is well debugged and there are a lot of fine details in there I don't want to mess with. My aims are to get the OO features and streaming behaviour working with a hopefully stable interface. Does that affect your gut feeling? Your error observations are significant and I think they dismiss my 1st suggestion. That leaves the possibilities of the whole new interface versus massaging the current interface with streaming/grouping APIs.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: