Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres
От | Sevo Stille |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39635EBF.789141D@ip23.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker wrote: > We had a *very* old version of PostgreSQL running on a Pentium acting as > an accounting/authentication backend to a RADIUS server for an ISP > ... uptime for the server itself was *almost* 365 days (someone hit the > power switch by accident, meaning to power down a different machine > *sigh*) ... PostgreSQL server had been up for something like 6 months > without any problems, with the previous downtime being to upgrade the > server ... At a previous employer, there is still a database running that has not seen a crash downtime ever since early 1996 - the only few downtimes it ever saw were for a rare few postgres, OS and hardware upgrades. As there have been no cries for help on any database or reboot issue ever since I left (I still am appointed as the DB admin in case of any trouble), it must be getting close to two years uptime by now, and that literally unattended. Sevo -- sevo@ip23.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: