Re: Query performance with min and filter
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query performance with min and filter |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3955504.1598881032@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Query performance with min and filter ("Yorwerth, Adam" <Adam.Yorwerth@tesco.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
"Yorwerth, Adam" <Adam.Yorwerth@tesco.com> writes: > We seem to have found a situation where a query run using explain analyse or pgbench is incredibly fast, but run via Javaunder load performs very poorly – we’ve checked query performance metrics for our Postgres instance and can confirm thatit’s the query running slowly, and not a Java problem. Usually when people report something like this, the explanation is that it's not actually the same query being tested in both cases. In particular, if you're parameterizing the query in Java but substituting constant values when running it manually, that can make a difference. A further-afield possibility is that your application has been set up to run with custom values of work_mem, planner cost constants, etc, which you're failing to duplicate in the manual tests. If all else fails, try installing auto_explain so that you can capture the actual query plan used when the application executes this query. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: