Re: BUG #17803: Rule "ALSO INSERT ... SELECT ..." fails to substitute default values
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17803: Rule "ALSO INSERT ... SELECT ..." fails to substitute default values |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3953951.1676991950@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17803: Rule "ALSO INSERT ... SELECT ..." fails to substitute default values (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17803: Rule "ALSO INSERT ... SELECT ..." fails to substitute default values
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes: > It looks like we need something like the attached, to deal with > product queries that are INSERT ... SELECT queries. In that case the > VALUES RTE will be at the same index, but in the SELECT part of the > product query, not the top-level product query itself. It seems like this bit: + rtr = (RangeTblRef *) linitial(pt->jointree->fromlist); + selectrte = rt_fetch(rtr->rtindex, pt->rtable); + selectquery = selectrte->subquery; is missing several essential checks. Is the node extracted from jointree->fromlist actually a RangeTblRef? Seems like it could be a JoinExpr or FromExpr instead; even if it can't be that today, an IsA check is cheap future-proofing. Likewise, once you've got your hands on the RTE, you should check rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY rather than assuming it's safe to touch the subquery field. (I see that getInsertSelectQuery isn't much better about this, but we should fix that while we're at it.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: