Re: Big 7.1 open items
От | Chris Bitmead |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39518B7C.F76108FD@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Big 7.1 open items (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Big 7.1 open items
Re: Big 7.1 open items Re: Big 7.1 open items Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > The symlink solution where the actual symlink location is not stored > > > in the database is certainly abstract. We store that info in the file > > > system, which is where it belongs. We only query the symlink location > > > when we need it for database location dumping. > > > > how would that work? would pg_dump dump the tablespace locations or not? > > > > pg_dump would recreate a CREATE TABLESPACE command: > > printf("CREATE TABLESPACE %s USING %s", loc, symloc); > > where symloc would be SELECT symloc(loc) and return the value into a > variable that is used by pg_dump. The backend would do the lstat() and > return the value to the client. I'm wondering if pg_dump should store the location of the tablespace. If your machine dies, you get a new machine to re-create the database, you may not want the tablespace in the same spot. And text-editing a gigabyte file would be extremely painful.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: