Re: Big 7.1 open items
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39505061.F42334AB@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Big 7.1 open items (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Big 7.1 open items
Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Yes, I didn't like the environment variable stuff. In fact, I would > like to not mention the symlink location anywhere in the database, so > it can be changed without changing it in the database. Well, as y'all have noticed, I think there are strong reasons to use environment variables to manage locations, and that symlinks are a potential portability and robustness problem. An additional point which has relevance to this whole discussion: In the future we may allow system resource such as tables to carry names which use multi-byte encodings. afaik these encodings are not allowed to be used for physical file names, and even if they were the utility of using standard operating system utilities like ls goes way down. istm that from a portability and evolutionary standpoint OID-only file names (or at least file names *not* based on relation/class names) is a requirement. Comments? - Thomas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: