Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3949.1536964323@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11
Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > I can see basically three sensible routes to go for v11 (before we > improve further): > 1) Leave it enabled, as currently. > 2) Disable it by default in v11, leave it enabled in master. > 3) Increase the costs substantially, so it triggers in far fewer > cases. Those would be too high for cases that want to benefit fully, > but would reduce the risk - although it also probably makes it > harder to easily hit problematic cases. I'd go with #2, personally. It does seem that the costing needs work, but it's not clear to me that we know what to change, so it's kinda late to propose #3 for v11. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: