Re: [Fwd: PostgreSQL RPMS...]

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > No idea.  I just brand the files.
> > ----
> > > > I assume that you may still be doing the RPMS's for PostgreSQL.
> > > > Just a note on the latest 7.0.2-1 RPMS release. The binaries from
> > > > the RPMS are reporting that they are version 7.0.1, instead of
> >
> > If I run psql -V on 7.0.2, it reports that it is 7.0.1.
> >
> > Oh well.
> >
> 
> Strange.  If you look in include/version.h.in, it constructs
> PG_VERSION_STR and I see 7.0.2 in there.  My guess is that somehow the
> tarball being grabbed has 7.0.1 in include/version.h.in, even though CVS
> has 7.0.2.
> 
> Can you check on that?

The tarball I had (which was the one Marc was _going_ to release) had
7.0.1; the current 7.0.2 tarball has 7.0.2.  I'll fix the RPM's with the
right tarball -- although, I built them _after_ the announcement.  Oh
well.  Time for a 7.0.2-2, I guess. 

So, the currently available tarball has the right string; the one I have
been distributing in the RPM's thinks its 7.0.1, except for the
packaging (which was the only real change in 7.0.2....:-))...

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11