Re: [GENERAL] NOTIFY/LISTEN in pgsql 7.0
От | Ed Loehr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] NOTIFY/LISTEN in pgsql 7.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 393FB401.9F4BCEE2@austin.rr.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [GENERAL] NOTIFY/LISTEN in pgsql 7.0 (Ed Loehr <eloehr@austin.rr.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > Ed Loehr <eloehr@austin.rr.com> writes: > > Is anyone successfully using the NOTIFY/LISTEN mechanism in pgsql 7.0? > > It still works AFAICT. Why, are you seeing a problem? No. I just hadn't recalled any discussion of it in 6 months and wondered if it was "bit-rotting". The context was a discussion on pgsql-sql re how to enable table-based caching of results in a modperl/DBI app. More specifically, use of NOTIFY/LISTEN to alert the apps when a table had been changed in order to invalidate cached results dependent on that table. After a closer look, I'm wondering how it would fit (if at all) with the mod_perl/DBI API/model. [BTW, I still haven't heard anything to dissuade me from thinking that server-side shared-mem result-set caching would be a huge performance win for many, many apps, including mine. I wish I better understood the lack of enthusiasm for that idea...] Regards, Ed Loehr
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: