Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded?
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3933D4F1.1F0CDC50@apex.net.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded? (Rich Teer <richard.teer@rite-group.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Rich Teer wrote: > > On Mon, 29 May 2000, Joseph Shraibman wrote: > > > > Postgresql works under a multi-process model, it will take advantage > > > of multiple processors. However it not multi-threaded. > > > > > So in other words, it *is* multithreaded. It just uses heavyweight > > threads. > > Thanks - but I did mean (light weight) threads, as opposed to processes. > I think the former can be more efficient than the latter - although perhaps > a bit more tricky to design well! Whenever someone talks about multithreaded, I think they are missing something important. Namely, that the performance difference between threads and processes is really not that great and separate processes are far and away more robust. It's almost impossible for one backend to accedently affect another. -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com> http://cupid.suninternet.com/~kleptog/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: