Re: parse partition strategy string in gram.y
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: parse partition strategy string in gram.y |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3930526.1666659024@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: parse partition strategy string in gram.y (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: parse partition strategy string in gram.y
Re: parse partition strategy string in gram.y |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > On 2022-Oct-24, Finnerty, Jim wrote: >> The advantage of hash partition bounds is that they are not >> domain-specific, as they are for ordinary RANGE partitions, but they >> are more flexible than MODULUS/REMAINDER partition bounds. I'm more than a bit skeptical of that claim. Under what circumstances (other than a really awful hash function, perhaps) would it make sense to not use equi-sized hash partitions? If you can predict that more stuff is going to go into one partition than another, then you need to fix your hash function, not invent more complication for the core partitioning logic. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: