Re: Unique and Primary Key Constraints

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Unique and Primary Key Constraints
Дата
Msg-id 3930.1026579835@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Unique and Primary Key Constraints  (Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca> writes:
> Yup.  Makes sense.  I submitted a patch which retains the difference. 
> If the index is created with CREATE UNIQUE, it's dumped with CREATE
> UNIQUE.  Constraint UNIQUE is treated likewise.

Yes, I was going to suggest that --- we should try to reproduce the way
that the definition was created, not enforce our own ideas of style.

CREATE INDEX will always be more flexible than constraints anyway
(non-default index type, non-default opclasses, partial indexes for
starters) so the notion that it might go away someday is a nonstarter.

Rod's original pg_depend patch tried to make a pg_constraint entry for
any unique index, but I changed it to only make entries for indexes
that were actually made from constraint clauses, so the distinction
is preserved in the system catalogs.  Just a matter of having pg_dump
respect it.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: