Re: Help with gram.y (UNDER)
От | Chris Bitmead |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Help with gram.y (UNDER) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 392BDA47.FE1E7686@bitmead.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Help with gram.y (UNDER) (Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Help with gram.y (UNDER)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
It seems like bison is confused by having that '(' just after an optional syntax (UNION). If I place something after OptUnder (USING just to pick a token), then everything works fine (except of course the spurious USING becomes part of the syntax). Does the '(' have some kind of second-class status as a token that would cause this wierdness? Chris Bitmead wrote: > > Can someone give be a bit of help with gram.y to get this UNDER syntax > right? I did what I though was the obvious syntax, but it no longer > accepts a plain create table after this change... > > OptUnder: UNDER relation_name_list { $$ = $2; } > | /*EMPTY*/ { $$ = NIL; } > ; > > CreateStmt: CREATE OptTemp TABLE relation_name OptUnder '(' > OptTableElementList ')' OptInherit > { > /*etc */ > } > ; > > The full patch is here... > ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/diff.x
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: