Re: SQL3 UNDER


> I'll try to provide examples later.  For now, did you see the gif 
> attachments on a earlier message of mine?  

I didn't before, but I do now.

> The UNDER and CLONES/INHERITS gif pictures
> provide a graphical view of what I mean.  UNDER creates tree hierarchy 
> down vertically, while INHERITS supports multiple inheritance in a 
> lateral direction.  The UNDER trees can be under any table that is part 
> of an INHERITS relationship.  UNDER and INHERITS work at different 
> levels sorta.  A subtable in an UNDER hierarchy can't be in an INHERITS > clause because it is logically just part of
itsmaximal supertable.  In 
 
> other words, INHERITS can provide a relationship between different 
> whole trees created by UNDER, by way of a maximal supertable being  
> inherited by another maximal supertable with its own
> UNDER tree.  Make any sense? :-)

I'm afraid not. Show me the (SQL) code :-).