Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3925F018.14A8913A@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) ("Matthias Urlichs" <smurf@noris.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The MySQL people probably didn't dig deeper into PostgreSQL's innards. > They don't seem to think it's their job to find out exactly why their > benchmark runs so slow on some other databases, and I don't particularly > fault them for that attitude. Hmm. And then who's job is it to take someone else's work and make it accurate? If the shoe were on the other foot: if I generated a benchmark suite and features list, and it contained major and numerous inaccuracies, who would you expect to be responsible (or at least feel responsible) for correcting/updating/improving it? 'Twould be me imho. We've tried, and failed (to date) to contribute information to the "crashme" travesty. My recollection was a ~30% error rate on information for Postgres, and I didn't look into the stats for other databases. Check the archives for details. > The PostgreSQL community has an attitude too, after all. Yup ;) > One of these might be to answer "you must have had fsync turned on" > whenever somebody reports a way-too-slow benchmark. In this case, > that's definitely not true. I'm sorry that has been your experience. imho, that initial response might be considered "helpful advice", not "attitude". And I'll submit that most postings I've seen (I'm mostly on the -hackers list) are followed up to the bitter end if the poster can state the problem succinctly and can follow up with specific information. But I'm a developer, so don't have the right outlook. > Anyway, I fully expect to have a more reasonable benchmark result by > tomorrow, and the MySQL guys will get a documentation update. Which they > _will_ put in the next update's documentation file. Trust me. ;-) Fantastic! We've been down this road before, and have had little luck in getting more than a token update of inaccuracies. Any little bit helps. And while you're at it, can you update their docs and web site to make clear that transactions and atomicity are not anywhere near the feature list of MySQL yet? TIA - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: