Re: double free corruption?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: double free corruption? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3918.1198860080@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: double free corruption? (Erik Jones <erik@myemma.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Erik Jones <erik@myemma.com> writes: > Well, if Postgres had killed the proc itself it would have written > out a nicely formatted Postgres-style memory context report along > with an ERROR message along the lines of OUT OF MEMORY and the > request size and Postgres would not have bounced. Since the > postmaster dropped into recovery mode when the proc received the > SIGABRT and died, that means that the signal came from somewhere > else, OOM killer? No, an abort() is expected when glibc's malloc code detects a problem, and all that other junk is stuff that malloc helpfully prints on stderr before committing hara-kiri. This seems clearly a memory-stomp bug of some kind (although there's a very small probability that it was a transient RAM glitch). Not much we can do about it without a test case, though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: