Petr Jelinek said:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> I'm still not very happy - we never got a reply about why the
>> reordering was needed at all. Referring in some way to FBSD doesn't
>> really answer for Windows. I am currently without a Windows box I can
>> use, so I am dependent on asking questions.
>
> Well, in MSVC addrinfo is defined this way (as in patch) too. MSVC does
> even have IPv6 detection in its header files.
>
That's certainly a better answer.
Does the detection work at runtime, or is it static? IIRC we found that
static detection broke the binary portability on Windows.
cheers
andrew