Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39125E2C.1B4FE0D2@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: pg_group_name_index corrupt? (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? RE: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Hiroshi did commit a change to doc/src/sgml/ref/postgres-ref.sgml for > that just a few days ago, but I guess it didn't make it into the derived > files that Thomas was preparing off-line. I believe there were several > other small doco fixes while Thomas was on vacation --- I dunno if he > plans to try to get those into the 7.0 derived docs or not. I'll move a new copy of the html into users-lounge before release, and will try poking at the hardcopy versions too (but I consider the hardcopy fixes noncritical since we are so far past the "freeze" point). Depends on the actual release schedule as to whether they will get in to the hardcopy; the pg_group stuff doesn't open a large can of worms, but we might want a few days for it to settle out?? btw, I'm all for fixing pg_group (it is really nonoptional imho) and the ODBC stuff is noncritical since loading the contrib/odbc/odbc.sql is sufficient to get the functions or operators defined since the support code is already in the backend. - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: