Re: Why Not MySQL?
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why Not MySQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39100660.20FBBDF2@tm.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why Not MySQL? (Malcontent null <malcontent@msgto.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why Not MySQL?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Malcontent null wrote: > > >Anyway, so the larger class of problem is for the Sybase/M$ user who > >relies on case insensitive queries (which *are* available in Postgres) Maybe the right place to introduce case-insensitiveness would be in ODBC driver then ? > If I may. > MS Access for all of it's damnable faults is the single most popular > database in the world. There are a whole slew of people who do nothing > except access programming and make very good money at it. Postgres is > a great candidate as a possible back end database engine for access. > This is a big possible application for postgres. To be usable for this > purpose however it needs a few things. > 1) Longer object names (I guess this is possible via a DEFINE) How long should they be ? > 2) Case insensitive queries. Probably only the Access subset ("like", "order by", maybe even "=" ?) > 3) Outer joins (coming soon!). > 4) Maybe ADO drivers for the VB users of the world. AFAIK MS moves fast and ADO will be soon (or is already) officially obsolete. The technology du jour is XML. > I don't know how important access integration is to the postgres > community as a whole though. Probably not a top priority. Oracle is much more often seen as the target. --------------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: