Re: Why Not MySQL?
От | Tim Uckun |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why Not MySQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 390F5E1D.8538744D@msgto.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why Not MySQL? ("Mitch Vincent" <mitch@huntsvilleal.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why Not MySQL?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> exponentially slower... So, sadly I have to go find another backend for this > application -- a commercial one too so we can get "commercial support" > (yuck).. Actually you might want to give Interbase a try. Version 6 is now in beta and is going to be open sourced. It's been around a while and seems pretty solid. There will be a commercial entity to buy support contracts from and the newsgroups are very helpful. As a bonus there is a realatively large installed user base already and very very nice client side tools available. See http://www.interbase.com/ or http://www.interbase2000.com/ for further details. If I can't get my questions answered about case sensitivity issues here (no help so far) I will most likely to use it myself. > I need is basically what PG has.. Transactions are a must as well as some > sort of sequence -- stability over performance but performance is very > important too. It also needs to run native on FreeBSD.. IB supports transactions and sequences. It's very stable and pretty fast. There was a problem with shared memory in the early beta and earlier releases but it's fixed now. I am pretty sure it runs on FreeBSD but I am not sure if it runs natively or under linux emulation.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: