Re: ODBC Stuff
| От | Karl DeBisschop |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ODBC Stuff |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 390893B7.F426889E@h00a0cc3b7988.ne.mediaone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | ODBC Stuff ("Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@altoplanos.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
"Roderick A. Anderson" wrote: > Sorry to ask this as I'm sure it's passed throught here but I'm also sure > I just looked at the messages briefly and then deleted them becuase I > didn't think I'd ever need the information. > > I'm working on a program that will run on a MS Windows platform and I > want it to use a database (PostreSQL) on a Linux box. From the research > I've been doing I get the impression that ODBC is the preferred, if not > the only, method to do this. So I'm hoping someone can point me at some > simple steps (they don't have to be too detailed) on getting a MS Windows > application to talk to a PostgreSQL database across a network. > > I've made a couple of passes over the unixODBC site and came away with > a much better understanding but just gave up on the MS (ODBC) site since > it looked like more of an advertisement than an information site. > > The application is being written in perl (ActiveState) and compiled > with perl2exe to make the installation impact (not a full perl > installation) on the Windows systems a little lighter. I don't venture into the windows world, but can I assume that DBI/DBD doesn't work in the perl install you describe? If DBI/DBD works then you should be golden. Assuming that DBI/DBDdoes work, then you should be able to connect over TCP/IP without any need for ODBC Karl DeBisschop www.infoplease.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: