Re: safety of vacuum verbose analyze on active tables
От | Ed Loehr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: safety of vacuum verbose analyze on active tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38FB3E91.43C53D91@austin.rr.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: safety of vacuum verbose analyze on active tables ("Andrew Snow" <als@fl.net.au>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Andrew Snow wrote: > > > > > what is the relative safety of doing a vacuum verbose analyze > > on a 24Gb > > > > table while there are selects and updates/inserts happening on it? > > > > > > As far as I know, the table is locked completely during a Vacuum. Any > > > transactions attempting to do inserts/updates will be paused > > safely. So go > > > ahead and schedule your vacuums for whenever you need to. > > > There have been reports of problems (corruption, etc.) when trying to do > > this. See the archive for a discussion along these lines a few > > months ago. > > You've got to be joking. > > Is the table locking mechanism in Postgresql broken?? I have no idea (but I doubt it). I simply recall this question being asked a few months back and a couple folks said something like "Hey, we tried this and had problems." That was with 6.5.* or earlier. Maybe one of those folks can pipe up again. I couldn't find them in the archive... Regards, Ed Loehr
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: