Re: Call for porting reports
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Call for porting reports |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38E7BDA7.2ED9313@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Call for porting reports (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I am now reproduceably getting this failure in the timestamp test. I have > never seen it before today:... > The catch is that this *always* happens in the (parallel) regression tests > but not if I run the file through psql by hand. Gives me a warm feeling > ... :( Almost certainly due to daylight savings time in PST8PDT (it happened today). As the doctor says, you'll feel better in a couple of days :) This happens every year (actually, twice a year). But it would be wrong to not test the yesterday/today/tomorrow feature at all... > Furthermore, PostgreSQL doesn't compile with gcc 2.8.1 (never has). I get > a fatal signal if backend/utils/adt/float.c is compiled with -O2 or > higher. The offending line is in function > float64 dpow(float64 arg1, float64 arg2) > *result = (float64data) pow(tmp1, tmp2); > Certainly a compiler bug, does anyone have a suggestion how this should be > handled? Is gcc 2.8.1 in wide-spread use? I'm guessing that 2.8.x is not in wide-spread use. What platform are you on? You could force -O0 for your platform, even just for that directory, as long as you don't disable it for other platform/compiler combinations. - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: