Re: [GENERAL] DHCP and pg_hba.conf
От | Ron Atkins |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] DHCP and pg_hba.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38C4135C.294C363A@earthlink.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | DHCP and pg_hba.conf (Ron Atkins <theotiwii@earthlink.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > One trick would be add the subnets/ips into the conf file and make > sure DHCP only gives out IP addresses from those subnets to those > clients that are authorized. That is an idea. Isn't PostgreSQL limited by not utilizing some type of name resolution? Am I looking for a work around because name resolution has yet to be added, or is my question flawed? Thank you for your help and your response Alfred -Ron PS: Another user posted this answer off list, I append our conversation: > use localhost (127.0.0.1). This begs the following two questions: Question 1: If the PostgreSQL client and server do not reside on the same host, is "localhost" just a kludge to indicate dynamic addressed clients? Question 2: On a single system used as host and server, RMI (Remote Method Invocation) refuses localhost as a parameter, it requires the hostname or the IP address. Naturally PostgreSQL does what it wants, have you had the occasion to confirm localhost works?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: