Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38BB6BA6.B5FACCAD@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by -
returns multiplesh
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > If not, I'd vote for pulling it out. That's a heck of a poor word to > > reserve. > I am afraid of lots of user complaints, even if we had not already used > TEMP. OK, but we've already got "user complaints" about TEMP being a reserved word, so that part seems to balance out. There is apparently no basis in published standards for TEMP being a reserved word. And btw it is not currently documented as a reserved word in syntax.sgml... - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: