Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38ADD786.97A98EF4@tm.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SQL compliance, was Re: [HACKERS] follow-up on PC Week Labsbenchmark results (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?
Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > I've since seen the article in the latest issue of PCWeek. The article > was not at all clear on the *specific* features which would disqualify > Postgres from having SQL92 entry level compliance (for most commercial > RDBMSes this is the only level they attain), and I was amused to note > that although InterBase was lauded for SQL92 compliance, the author > did encourage them to consider supporting the SQL92 comment delimiter > ("--") in their next release :)) Why does PostgreSQL _not_ support the -- comment delimiter ? Is there something complicated to supporting it in parser ? IMNSHO it would require only a few lines in gram.y Does supporting user-defined operators interfere ? I assume we could comfortably disallow -- as a possible operator (one can't input it from interactive psql anyway) -------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: