Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C
От | Chris Bitmead |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38AC9F0D.4931DB92@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | psql and Control-C (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Whoa whoa... It's a bit more complicated than you think, there's a lot > of state that gets put into libpq, I don't think this has anything to do with libpq. This has got to do with psql's reading of commands _before_ they get shoved into libpq. As such it shouldn't be that dangerous. > i guess the simplest way would be > to do so and also cancel the transaction, but a simple longjump won't > work reliably and you'd also have to take very careful steps to make > sure you handle everything _just right_ from a signal context. > > I'd rather have the inconvience of psql exiting than a not entirely > thought out mechanism for doing this properly potentially having psql > run amok on my database. :) > > -- > -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] > > ************
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: