Re: [INTERFACES] A question on triggers
От | Constantin Teodorescu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] A question on triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38AAEB22.19CF1C6B@flex.ro обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | A question on triggers (Constantin Teodorescu <teo@flex.ro>) |
Ответы |
Re: [INTERFACES] A question on triggers
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Ed Loehr wrote: > > Constantin Teodorescu wrote: > > > > I have two tables "inputs" and "outputs" and they hold items and > > quantities that are coming and going from a warehouse. > > > > I have defined also another table "stock" that will hold the inventory > > of that warehouse. > > > > I have defined triggers on INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE on "inputs" and > > "outputs" tables that update acordingly the "stock" table! > > > > What's my problem? > > > > Is there any chance to restrict the direct updates of any user to the > > "stock" table? > > So that the information in the "stock" table should be updated ONLY by > > those triggers? > > Just for kicks, here's a hack. Add a column named 'passwd' to the > stock table (with a bogus default value), then create an UPDATE > trigger on stock requiring the UPDATE to include a valid 'passwd' > column value that's only known (hard-coded) to your 'inputs' and > 'outputs' triggers. Would that work? I think it will work! It's really a good idea! But wouldn't be nice if PostgreSQL could offer a more elegant solution? Constantin Teodorescu FLEX Consulting Braila, ROMANIA
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: