Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
От | Chris Bitmead |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38A8C735.4E5A1280@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Solution for LIMIT cost estimation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Don Baccus wrote: > > At 10:30 AM 2/15/00 +1100, Chris Bitmead wrote: > > >It's a logical fact that the existance of "offset", automatically > >implies > >ordering, no matter how many SQL textbooks you quote. > > Chris, that is your opinion and judging from the responses of other > folks on this list, it appears to be very much a minority opinion. > > Minority of one, as a matter of fact. There has been a parade > of posts disagreeing with your opinion. I've heard no-one say that offset is meaningful or in any sense useful in the absense of order. If it means something please enlighten us. If not, try reading before posting. > Why not give up and get on with your life before I get tired of > being polite? I'm *much* more stubborn than you are, particularly > when I'm right.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: