Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38A8C61D.90557A4B@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Almost there on column aliases (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases
Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Right. I'm looking forward to advice on the right way to do this. The > > problem is that the introductory character for list structures is > > *also* the introductory character for plans, so everything blows > > chunks if I just call nodeRead() from _readAttr(). > Huh? '{' introduces a node, '(' introduces a list. See the comments > I added (not very long ago :-() in read.c. My guess is that you are > either emitting the wrong character or have some sort of error in the > way you call nodeRead. Nothing obviously wrong in the patch diffs > though. The problem I recall is that paren also introduces a "plan", and if you call nodeRead() it sees the paren and then complains later because it expects a node label following the paren. I probably misdiagnosed the behavior, but in any case I'd be *really* happy if someone wants to put me out of my misery on this one ;) - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: