Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT
От | Jose Soares |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3896DD49.26143978@sferacarta.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Don Baccus wrote: > At 09:41 AM 1/31/00 +0100, Jan Wieck wrote: > > > Of course, removing END/ABORT will touch many applications > > using transactions, but I would vote for it anyway, since > > it's standard. > > Does it make all that much sense to worry about the actual word > used when the need to use "begin" is non-standard to begin with? There is no explicit "BEGIN WORK" on SQL92, transaction initiation is always implicit and it terminates either with aCOMMIT or a ROLLBACK statement. > > > Of course, removing that would REALLY impact current applications... > > - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> > Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest > Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at > http://donb.photo.net. > > ************ -- Jose' Soares Bologna, Italy Jose@sferacarta.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: