Bit strings
От | Adriaan Joubert |
---|---|
Тема | Bit strings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3891AB94.898ADAA2@albourne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Bit strings
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Bruce, I think there has been some confusion about the bit/bit varying stuff I did. I initially sent in a bit type that was non-SQL compliant, with the suggestion that this may be useful to stick into contrib. Then several people remarked that it would be better to have an SQL compliant type, so I wrote the code to do all the manipulations, roughly based on src/backend/utils/adt/varchar.c This can evidently not be used as a standalone routine, but needs to be properly integrated into the database as a type. Unfortunately I don't really know an awful lot about the internals of postgres, and got a bit stuck trying to figure out how to integrate a new type correctly. Now I see that this second set of routines has ended up in the contrib directory, where they are quite useless. In my opinion it would be best to have no bit-type in the contrib directory and have the proper SQL compliant one properly integrated into postgres, but I'm going to need some hints to do that correctly. So my question is how we should proceed on this. Am I right in assuming that there should be no major objections to adding an SQL type to postgres, or should I go through another iteration on the mailing list? Thanks for any suggestions, Adriaan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: