Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database]
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38760A15.E29A0C8A@tm.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] (darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" wrote: > > Thus spake Lamar Owen > > [Ok, I've been in touch with the author of the 'First Major Open Source > > Database' article. Here's what he wants to do. Let me know what you > > think, and correct any misinformation I may have fed him.] > > [...] > > - University Ingres, developed starting in 1977, qualifies for the > > 'First Major Open Source Database' honor. Ingres is the direct > > ancestor of PostgreSQL. > > Not that it is so important but I think that Postgres was a different > project by the same person (Dr. Micheal Stonebraker) so it is probably > more accurate to call them siblings. AFAIK it was a different project that built heavily on Ingres (and Postgres's query language PostQUEL was an extended version of (University)Ingres' QUEL. Both were later commercially extended + -UniversityIngres(with QUEL) --> Ingres(withSQL)|\- Postgres(PostQuel) -+-> Illustra(SQL) -> InformixUDB(SQL) \-> Postgres95(SQL) -> PostgreSQL(SQL) So I think that Ancestor is more accurate than Sibling. ------------ Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: