Re: [HACKERS] (OT) Linux limits
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] (OT) Linux limits |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38760951.F7D2C8E4@wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | (OT) Linux limits (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote: > setting the limit to infinity by users. Don't know if Mandrake is > configured differently from RH6.1, but until I get this adjusted it > doesn't make a reasonable development machine... My experience has been that starting with version 6.0 Mandrake is diverging from RedHat. Mandrake 5.3 can properly be called 'RedHat 5.2+KDE+enhancements' -- Mandrake 6.0 and 6.1, being released before their RedHat counterparts, are not nearly as close. I tried using Mandrake 6.0 to build RPMs, and quickly replaced it with RedHat 6.0 -- Mandrake 6.0 used pgcc instead of egcs, for one. Caused me all manner of grief. Mandrake 6.1 may be better in this regard, but I am sticking with RedHat for the time being, as it is the current baseline target of the RPM distribution. From what I understand, the RedHat binary RPM's still work with Mandrake. Mandrake is now a full-fledged distribution, not just another RedHat knock-off. I'm going to have to get my home machine into a multidevelopment mode, with RedHat, Caldera, SuSE, and Mandrake multibooting, as each of these RPM-based distributions is different, although Mandrake and RedHat are more alike than SuSE and Caldera. Or, you can help me with Mandrake issues in both the source and binary RPM's, just as I am getting assistance from others with the Alpha patches, building/installing the RPM's under SuSE and Caldera, and other architecture (ARM and MIPS come to mind) issues. Portability amongst Linux distributions is becoming nearly as big of issue as portability amongst different Unices. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: