Re: post-freeze damage control
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: post-freeze damage control |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3867997.1712695051@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: post-freeze damage control (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: post-freeze damage control
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 5:12 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> * OrClauseGroupKey is not a Node type, so why does it have >> a NodeTag? I wonder what value will appear in that field, >> and what will happen if the struct is passed to any code >> that expects real Nodes. > I used that to put both not-subject-of-transform nodes together with > hash entries into the same list. This is used to save the order of > clauses. I think this is an important property, and I have already > expressed it in [1]. What exactly is the point of having a NodeTag in the struct though? If you don't need it to be a valid Node, that seems pointless and confusing. We certainly have plenty of other lists that contain plain structs without tags, so I don't buy that the List infrastructure is making you do that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: