Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data
От | Ed Loehr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38589D3E.40C8174@austin.rr.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data
Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > If there was corrupt data in a table, how would one go about finding it? > > The brute-force way is to do a SELECT * or COPY TO and see if the > backend survives ;-). If not, narrowing down which record is bad > is left as an exercise for the student... One RDBMS I used had a utility called 'dbcheck' which did some sort of examination of indices, tables, etc., and issued an 'OK' or 'CORRUPT' for each examined object. Such a utility for pgsql might simply do some combination of SELECT * or COPY TO as you suggest above. Would it be reasonable to put such a tool make its way onto the todo list, in the absence of better alternatives? I'd argue it's important for pgsql's future popular prospects to be able to be _operated_ (i.e., live dbs backed up, diagnosed as corrupted, and restored) by folks who may know very little about the internals or the design of the schema/code. Quick and correct diagnosis of the problem is the key for them. Such a tool would seem to go a long way toward that end. Cheers, Ed Loehr
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: