Re: [GENERAL] server hardware recommendations (the archives aredead)
От | Jeff Hoffmann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] server hardware recommendations (the archives aredead) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3857F72A.C95FD63F@propertykey.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] server hardware recommendations (the archives are dead) (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Ed Loehr wrote: > Jeff Hoffman wrote: > > > ...i have seen several places which told me > > that software raid under linux _isn't_ safe for multiprocessors & no > > place has told me for sure that it is. > > Would you mind clarifying your understanding on which versions of linux are unsafe > for software raid and how? Browsing deja, RH 6.1 (2.2.12-20smp) reportedly handles > software raid without known problems (other than less than glowing documentation > reviews), and I'm setting up pgsql/apache on such a system with software raid (no > clear showstopping problems yet). i'm not running RH6.1, but i am using a 2.2.12 kernel (compiled myself) and like i said, no catastrophic problems. the problems, i believe, came up with a conversation about an earlier 2.2 version of the kernel and it may have included problems with adaptec SCSI controllers in conjunction with software raid on SMP systems. i don't remember where i found the references, though. i believe the adaptec 7880 driver was fixed by 2.2.10, and there were a bunch of SMP fixes between 2.2.6 - 2.2.10, so 2.2.12 is probably as safe as anything. you never hear about things that work, just about things that don't.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: