Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3855F34F.9B30308E@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | UNICODE characters vs. BINARY (Gunther Schadow <gunther@aurora.rg.iupui.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> A related question is whether we could support some more > standard names for data types (e.g., BIGINT, SMALLINT, etc.) > But I'm not sure there is really any standard. I would be > willing to work a little on these data types but I'd need > someone to hint me on who else is doing stuff and, if possible, > where to look first (and what known mistakes to avoid.) postgres=> create table x (i smallint); CREATE postgres=> create table y (j bigint); ERROR: Unable to locate type name 'bigint' in catalog afaik we support the type names defined in SQL92 (like smallint), historical names in Postgres, and some extensions. What more do we need? - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: