Re: postgresql definitive list of network resources used/needed?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql definitive list of network resources used/needed? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 384610.1660168232@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql definitive list of network resources used/needed? (Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgresql definitive list of network resources used/needed?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com> writes: >> On Aug 10, 2022, at 3:08 PM, richard coleman <rcoleman.ascentgl@gmail.com> wrote: >> Apparently, I've discovered that PostgreSQL connects to itself over UDP. > No it doesn't. (It can use Unix domain sockets for local connections.) Possibly Richard is seeing the stats collector pipe, which is TCP local loopback on a random port number. (That'll be gone in v15, but it exists in all current releases.) > I've also discovered, while looking at the network while one of our server was running PostgreSQL, that while there werea number of connections between local 5432 and a random remote port, there was also a connection from a local randomport to a remote 5432. If these ports were closed and only 5432 left open, this connection would have failed. postgres_fdw outgoing connection to a remote server? Maybe it's something else, but that's the most obvious theory. The incoming-connection port and the stats loopback are the only IP connections in a bare-bones Postgres system, but I think few people run it completely bare-bones. There's no such thing as a "definitive list" of ports used as long as you've told us nothing about (for example) your backup or replication setup, not to mention postgres_fdw and other extensions you might use. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: