Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
От | Adriaan Joubert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38436D49.16D5580F@albourne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > > I can integrate the type for you into the include/catalog files if > > > everyone agrees they want it as a standard type and not an contrib type. > > > > Hi, > > > > Attached are the C-routines that implement a BIT and BIT VARYING type. > > I know Bruce said he would integrate them, but he is writing a book at > > the moment as well, so if somebody can explain to me how to go about > > integrating it, or would like to have a go, go ahead. > > Applied. I am embarrassed to say I had a copy from June still in my > mailbox. Don't be: they've been ready for a while, but I had to recheck them. When BIT and BIT VARYING are properly integrated, do I need to do something about regression tests? Adriaan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: