Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> I have to say that I'm going to change on-disk database/table/index
> >> file names to _OID_! This is required by WAL because of inside of
> >> log records there will be just database/table/index oids, not names,
> >> and after crash recovery will not be able to read pg_class to get
> >> database/table/index name using oid ...
>
> > Wow, that is a major pain.  Anyone else think so?
> > Using oid's instead of names may give us some ability to fix some other
> > bugs, though.
>
> Yes, and yes.  I've been trying to nerve myself to propose that, because
> it seems the only reasonable way to make rollback of RENAME TABLE and
> DROP TABLE work safely.  It'll be a pain in the neck for debugging and
> admin purposes though.

So, no more nerves needed, Tom, yeh? -:)
It would be nice if someone else, not me, implement this...

> Can we make some sort of usually-correct-but-not-guaranteed-correct
> dump that shows which corresponds to what?  Maybe something similar
> to the textfile dump of pg_shadow that the postmaster uses for password
> authentication?  Then at least you'd have some shot at figuring out
> which file was what in extremis...

As it was proposed - utility to create dir with database name
(in addition to dir with database oid where data really live)
and symlinks there: table_name --> ../db_oid/table_oid

Vadim