Re: pgsql-server: Vacuum delay activated by default.

Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
> On 8/7/2004 12:47 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What?  If there was consensus to do this, I missed it.  If there was
>> even any *discussion* of doing this, I missed it.

> How many questions about vacuum still grabbing all available bandwidth,
> vacuum slowing down the whole system, vacuum being all evil do you want
> to answer for 8.0? Over and over again we are defending reasonable
> default configuration values against gazillions of little switches, and
> this is a reasonable default that will be a relief for large databases
> and makes more or less no difference for small ones.

What basis do you have for saying that this is a reasonable default?
Does anyone else agree?

Again, it's the lack of discussion that is bothering me.

            regards, tom lane